Thursday, July 25, 2013

Treat Your Customer Like Your Date

Today, businesses spend a ton of resources attracting new customers without an understanding of what it takes to sustain a positive customer experience (CX). In fact, surveys reveal 80 percent of companies believe they deliver superior CX, yet only eight percent of their customers agree. If you take your significant other out on a date, do you dress like a slob and ignore them? Not if you want the relationship to continue – just as you do with your customer.

According to Daryl Travis, author, "How Does It Make You Feel?" and CEO, Brandtrust, in order to create a great CX it’s essential to have an understanding of experiences that trigger the emotions that drive your customer’s brand preference. Travis recently shared some tips with Retail Customer Experience on how business can use emotion to create a better CX.

How Your Customers Feel
According to psychologists, what people remember about a CX is determined by the intensity of emotions created in specific moments—not the overall experience. “This is true for most experiences throughout our lives. Our non-conscious mind categorizes and catalogues experiences according to the nature and intensity of emotions,” writes Travis.

When processing new stimuli, the non-conscious mind associates past memories and responds emotionally before rational thought occurs. When neurologists discovered that 95 percent of thought, emotion and learning occur this way, behavioral economists realized non-consious emotional responses shaped by past memories determine customer attitudes and behavior—not conscious, rational decisions.

Leverage Emotional Insights to Build Trust
Travis says that when considering CX, it’s important to be mindful that trust and faith are essential emotions. When customers perceive your company as trustworthy, they buy your products. Demonstrating trustworthiness can be done when a situation is negative as well.  Trustworthiness is demonstrated by being reliable and concerned for your customer’s needs. The company must demonstrate that it will always act in a caring way toward the customer, no matter the circumstances.

Build empathy
Even though budgets are limited, it’s important to invest in a deep understanding of your customer. With this clarity, teams are able to focus, certain that what they are doing matters to their customers. This is where empathy building can help. It’s also important for senior leadership to understand what customers experience throughout their daily lives. This often shifts how they look at their business, sparking fresh thinking in an empathetic understanding of customers.

Internalize the CX
For an initiative to succeed in improving the CX, senior leadership needs to “live” the brand. This involves articulating the brand promise internally so that people understand what is expected. Each aspect of delivering a positive CX needs to be “caught, not taught,” according to Travis. Leaders intent on changing employee behavior must do so by exemplifying the vision for how the brand is to be experienced. By sharing an understanding of the emotional drivers for a positive CX, it’s possible to refocus employees around what works. Applied social science research has demonstrated that emphasizing the positive rather than trying to eliminate the negative is effective in improving an organization’s capacity for change.

Implement a Plan
Finally, it’s necessary for a work plan to be undertaken to facilitate acceptance and adoption of the behaviors necessary to bring the vision and values of the new CX to life throughout the organization. This process will help to transcend ambiguities and inspire colleagues to internalize and live the new experience promise.

Amanda Ciccatelli, Social Media Strategist at IIR USA in New York City, has a background in digital and print journalism, covering a variety of topics in business strategy, marketing, and technology. She previously worked at Technology Marketing Corporation as a Web Editor where she covered breaking news and feature stories in the tech industry.  She can be reached at aciccatelli@iirusa.com. Follow her at @AmandaCicc. 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

7 Principles of the Social Customer

The digital age and its explosion of social media has changed the customer’s buying cycle. With it came the rise of a new kind of customer—one that has been known to shake up even the most respected brands, known as the “Social Customer.” The Social Customer is every man, woman and child that is an active participant of social media – which is in about 1.4 billion people. The voice of the Social Customer has proved to be so powerful that it has created social media mayhem for companies from small to large.
According to Mobile Youth, here are the seven principles of the Social Customer, which provide new insights for customer experience and consumer behavior:
1) Social Motivations, Not Social Media
If we want to understand the Social Customer, we must first understand their motivation. Social motivation reveals why trends happen. It’s easy to look at social media as the answer but simply making media “social” doesn’t make it more social.

2) Social by Design
Our two most basic social needs are the need to belong and the need to be significant. When unable to feel belonging and significance, we experience negative emotions often resorting to what, appears to the observer, irrational behavior but in reality has a more logical underpinning in the Social Code –which is every interaction from communication to how and why we buy.

3) Offline Beats Online
Even in the digital age, face to face communication remains king. While this generation may be comfortable with modern communication technology, technology is a means not an end.

4) The Disconnected Generation Wants More Relationships
The Disconnected Generation care more about the inefficiencies of daily life because these inefficiencies are the meaning they seek. The basic interaction and social fabric of our lives afforded to previous generations is being lost and youth are leading the charge to reclaim these basic privileges through the products they buy.

5) 90% of Communication is Passive
Consumer psychology shows how much of our social meaning is communicated through mundane behaviors. Just because we don’t see it or it doesn’t appear obvious doesn’t mean that it’s meaningless. When parents walk into the back room and see their teen children “hanging out” with friends they are often perplexed by how unproductive this behavior is.

6) Everything is Social
Years of mobile industry research into how young people use smartphones highlights how everything is a Social Tool. People don’t buy stuff, they buy what stuff does for them. The mobile phone is a powerful social tool, but not the only one available.

7) The More You Track the Social Customer, the Less You Understand
If you want to better understand buying behavior, we can’t rely on more data. Insights come from an emotional connection that evades the transparent world of Big Data. Students send pictures of themselves making funny faces, sticking out their tongues or virtual doodles made from the back of classmate’s heads. And that means, Big Data misses out because it can’t track what’s not shared in the public domain.


Amanda Ciccatelli, Social Media Strategist at IIR USA in New York City, has a background in digital and print journalism, covering a variety of topics in business strategy, marketing, and technology. She previously worked at Technology Marketing Corporation as a Web Editor where she covered breaking news and feature stories in the tech industry.  She can be reached at aciccatelli@iirusa.com. Follow her at @AmandaCicc. 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Arguments for and against deploying a collaborative social network



Here's the debate:  

  • Must we have a social network for collaboration at work?  
  • How about with your customers?


On one hand we want everyone’s opinion.  We appreciate that our employees and our customers have information we should collect and synthesize.  But naysayers will always point out why this premise either won’t work or that the information is unreliable.

There are always those folks within a company who are steadfastly against encouraging the use of a social network within a company.  They think their employees should be paying attention to their “day jobs”, not frittering away their time surfing the web.  It’s not that they can’t see the benefit of having workers talk to each other or with customers…they just believe this time is misspent. 

This is not a new notion.  That same complaint used to be made about coffee houses even though great ideas came out of these meeting places.  In the 1600’s Anthony Wood, an Oxford academic noted, “Why doth solid and serious learning decline, and few or none follow it now in the University?” he asked. “Answer: Because of Coffea Houses, where they spend all their time.”  

The smartest people of the time congregated at coffee houses to extend the discussions began at meetings of the Members of the Royal Society, England’s pioneering scientific society.  So too can collaborative social networks provide a place for ongoing collaboration in between episodic events.  You can have a big meeting, and then continue the discussion via a social setting.

Like coffee houses of the past, social networks can provide a lively social and intellectual environment, giving rise to a stream of innovations that can shape the world. We still consider coffee as the official drink of collaboration and networking (at least before 5PM).

The path of using a social network to collaborate at work requires our brains to work differently.  Some studies have shown it will take you 23 minutes to get back on track after posting a status line on either twitter or Facebook and that a social media interruption occurs every 10.5 minutes on average, and people waste 41% of that time on Facebook. Yet, a study published in 2012 by McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, found that the use of social networking within companies increased the productivity of “knowledge workers” by 20 to 25 percent.

The notion of workers collaborating on line might be inevitable.  A survey by virtual office staffing agency Intelligent Office finds that more and more employees are choosing where they want to work, rather than being assigned a standard workplace location. Specifically, 70% of the employees surveyed work from alternate locations on a regular basis.  You can’t have all your meetings at work if everyone works someplace different.
 
Here’s another reason why a social network dedicated to collaboration is inevitable.   Most employees spend about a quarter of their time managing e-mail.  They spend about one day of the work week looking for internal information or tracking down the right people. With internal social networks, the message IS the content.  You can find the co-worker you need easily (even if you’ve never met). 
If you can have a central repository of information; of content, employees’ time (spent looking for the information they need) can be cut by a third.

And adoption might be inevitable also because it appears the speed and scale of adoption exceeds other technologies.

One danger the collaborative social network presents is when one voice is worth more than others.  The idea to encourage democracy is a constant challenge.   Just like in ancient Rome, when someone important recommended a book (and had the resources to have scribes make copies), executives today can approve content and tacitly encourage support for any given idea.

The initial promise of social media was to help ideas succeed on their own.  It was thought these open forums would remove the old gatekeepers.  In fact social media is not especially democratic. The most powerful people and institutions have the most Facebook fans and Twitter followers which means that content that serves their interests is much more likely to show up in your newsfeed.

The conclusions to be drawn?  Social networks dedicated to collaborative ideation appear to be inevitable.  Methods to keep the process democratic must be part of the deployment strategy.  It takes more than just rolling out a new social network ideation tool…a strategy for nurturing a culture ripe for collaboration must be encouraged.

TOM STANDAGE,  NY Times, June 22, 2013
Writing on the Wall: Social Media - The First 2,000 Years By TOM STANDAGE


Ron Shulkin blogs researches and writes about enterprise technology focused on social media, innovation, voice of the customer, marketing automation and enterprise feedback management.  You can learn more about Ron at his biography web site:www.shulkin.net. You can follow him Twitter. You can follow his blogs at this Facebook group.  You can connect with Ron on LinkedIn.  
 
Ron Shulkin is Vice President of the Americas for CogniStreamer®, an innovation ecosystem. CogniStreamer serves as a Knowledge Management System, Idea Management System and Social Network for Innovation. You can learn more about CogniStreamer here http://bit.ly/ac3x60 . Ron manages The Idea Management Group on LinkedIn (JoinHere).



How to Create Made-to-Order Customer Experience

Welcome to the world that will not wait, where each customer service interaction is driven by the "me" mentality.

According to Google's "The New Multi-screen World: Understanding Cross-Platform Consumer Behavior," the average consumer moves among three screens per day to search for information and perform tasks. In addition to potentially being multiscreen, customer service transactions are also often multichannel, performed across a varying combination of platforms including but not limited to phone, email, chat, social media, smartphone, or tablet.

An Ovum study of more than 8,000 consumers shows that 74 percent now use at least three channels when interacting with an enterprise for customer-related issues—and this approach to resolution is completely changing the way support communicates with customers. The consumer is now in control, demanding service anytime, anywhere, via the channel of his or her choice.

Therefore, many big brands have brought back the structure of single-file service by making certain customer support contact information less accessible and siphoning customers through one or two more cost-effective channels like email or live chat. But between the bloggers, the media, and the public outcry on social media, these could not contain consumers who demanded a made-to-order customer experience based on expectations.

So, how does a brand master all the combinations? Destination CRM has shared some insightful answers:

Offer as many customer service channels as possible. Expectations of today's customer are for service at least via phone, email, and online support portal. Additional channels that prove to be customer service differentiators include live chat, self-service knowledge base, mobile, social media, and video.

Embrace agile channeling. While an organization may offer a variety of customer service channels, you'll increasingly frustrate customers if they're not connected.

More and more customers are expecting service and support to be agile. They want service to start an interaction at one point, whether that's phone or email or help desk, and the brand should be able to carry over that information and continue the conversation as the customer arrives at the next touch point.

Know thy customer. Locked hand in hand with agile channeling is the personalized customer experience. Without aggregated data, information, and feedback from across all channels, you will never have a true 360-degree view of the customer to create a made-to-order customer experience.

With a new generation of customers demanding more and reaching out and voicing their opinions across more channels, brands can only contain the empowered consumer with siloed channels for so long. Customers have figured out their own way to put themselves first.

Amanda Ciccatelli, Social Media Strategist at IIR USA in New York City, has a background in digital and print journalism, covering a variety of topics in business strategy, marketing, and technology. She previously worked at Technology Marketing Corporation as a Web Editor where she covered breaking news and feature stories in the tech industry.  She can be reached at aciccatelli@iirusa.com. Follow her at @AmandaCicc. 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Your Answer May Depend On What Chair You Sit In



People lie.  That’s a fact.  Sometimes when they don’t even mean to lie.  The situation, the way you ask the question, the surroundings… all contribute to folks’ responses.  But you can optimize your chances for the truth by manipulating external forces.

Here are some variables you can pay attention to for your next Focus Group or Collaborative Collective Intelligence Challenge…

Bigger Is NOT Better
If you want to be sure your participants are operating in an ethical manner, you might want to squeeze them into a tight space.  You might not appear to be the most cordial host, but if you give folks roomy chairs, they’re more likely to reasonably consider a false response.  Expansive postures encourage people to relax the rules.  People in wide poses are more likely to overlook flaws in your product or within others’ ideas.    A large work area encourages and positions people to be more likely to cheat.  Those in spacious seats are more likely to ignore instructions.  In fact, in NYC, a study showed that cars with larger passenger compartments were more likely to double park.

Sort of makes me think we should not be surprised in the future if people bend the rules during a Passover Seder ("Why is it that on all other nights we eat either sitting or reclining, but on this night we eat in a reclining position?") 

Conservatives Are More Liberal Than They Think
For those on your team or in a Focus Group who self describe as “Conservative” or for that matter the older people on your team, you can expect them to act even more conservative when you pose a question. It turns out that people who reported being in the center and on the right actually held views on the issues that were more liberal than their partisanship would suggest. But people who are somewhat conservative identify as even more conservative as an expression of loyalty when it comes time to finally vote on a topic.  It probably stems from a desire to keep things status quo.

OK, Bigger IS Better
It all depends on how you ask the question.  If you offer a product that is “double sized”, “king sized”, people will think it is worth more whether it is truly bigger or not.  Studies show people are willing to pay more for equivalent portions with larger sounding labels.  In fact they ate less of a portion when it had a larger sounding label.

Doubting Thomas Notes Details
If you want people to pay attention to details, the minor differences in your new product…If you want people to give your offering a fighting chance…Put them in a distrustful state.  If your audience thinks they might be hoodwinked, they’ll put a keen eye on the topic at hand.  A distrustful frame of mind causes people to pay attention to dissimilarity, including how things may be different from stereotypes.

I Must Be Right…Everyone Agrees With Me
There is a famous notion that the winning project is the one suggested by THPPITR (The Highest Paid Person In The Room). If you ever wondered why these CXO’s are comfortable with this path, they’re not acting with guile…it’s likely because they think everyone in the room agrees with them.  Studies show senior executives will assume everyone shares their values.  They can even project their moods on to others. 

If these senior executives are part of your ideation team, you might want to figure out a way to democratize the process so their opinions and votes are of the same value as other team members.

Wrap Up
This reminds me of something I heard in a college course entitled “How to lie with statistics”.  They pointed out that a company who sold toothpaste asked dentists what toothpaste they preferred.  The fact was they kept asking more and more dentists until they finally got a sample where “9 out of 10” dentists agreed their toothpaste was the best.  They might have had to ask a few thousand groups of ten until they got there…but they were quite patient and required a certain response.

The Truth?  You can’t handle the truth!  Or maybe you can’t necessarily trust what you’re hearing if the situational circumstances are skewed against you, or in the favor of a choice you wouldn’t prefer. 

Yap, A. et al., “The Erogonomics of Dishonesty:  The Effet of Incidental Posture on Stealing, Cheating, and Traffic Violations,” Pscyhlogical Science (forthcoming).

Zell, E. & Bernstein, M., “You May Think You’re Right…Young Adults Are More Liberal than They Relize,”Social Psychological and Personality Science (forthcoming).

Just, D. & Wansink, B., “One Man’s Tall is Another Man’s Small:  How the Framing of Portion Size Influcences Food Choice, “ Health Economics (forthcoming).

Posten, A.-C. & Mussweiler, T., “When Distrust Frees Your Mind”, Journal of Perosnialty and Social Psychology (forthcoming).

Overbeck, J. & Droutman, V., “One for All: Social Power Incrases Self-Anchoring of Traits, Attitudes, and Emotions,” Psychological Science (forthcoming).

Ron Shulkin blogs researches and writes about enterprise technology focused on social media, innovation, voice of the customer, marketing automation and enterprise feedback management.  You can learn more about Ron at his biography web site:www.shulkin.net. You can follow him Twitter. You can follow his blogs at this Facebook group.  You can connect with Ron on LinkedIn.  

Ron Shulkin is Vice President of the Americas for CogniStreamer®, an innovation ecosystem.  CogniStreamer serves as a Knowledge Management System, Idea Management System and Social Network for Innovation.  You can learn more about CogniStreamer here http://bit.ly/ac3x60 .  Ron manages The Idea Management Group on LinkedIn (JoinHere).

Stand Out from the Crowd: Create Innovative Customer Experiences

How can your business create an innovative customer experience (CX) that helps your stand out? It’s harder than one might think.

According to a recent Forester report, “Customer Experience Innovation Demystified,” everyone talks about innovation, but no one knows quite what it is or how to get it. Today, the biggest driver for CX innovation is differentiation that will distinguish a company in the marketplace. Thirteen percent of respondents are shooting for a better CX than any company in any industry. The report states “innovation that drives differentiation and long-term value is the key to getting there.

Additionally, more and more companies want innovation. Customers have higher expectations than ever, upstarts are using technology to compete, and competitive advantages do not last long. Forrester points to customers being wow’d by new apps like Google Now, to Warby Parker’s Net-based competition with established retailers like LensCrafters, and to USAA’s short-lived advantage with its mobile check deposit app.


However, the strategy and planning do not match the ambition. Three-quarters of respondents focus on making incremental improvements, not radical ones. And, less than a third said they connect CX improvements with results that have business consequences. Not to mention, the majority of respondents said their companies plan CX innovation by watching their competitors or companies in other industries, 62 percent expect technological improvements will help them innovate, and only 53 percent develop ways to understand customer needs.


Ultimately, Forrester says that CX innovation differs from normal innovation processes because it goes beyond traditional methods. CX improvement enhances current customer needs, while innovation solves unmet ones. Companies need to reframe their business opportunities as meeting customers’ unmet needs. To do so, of course, involves looking at the company’s CX from the customer’s needs.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

The 4 Phases of Customer Maturity

These days the list of things that can go wrong in creating and managing the processes that comprise the execution of the customer experience is endless. Despite the complexities in managing all aspects of the customer experience, companies' intentions are in the right place.

In fact, a Forrester study has revealed that companies are ambitious when it comes to customer experience (CX). Forty-seven percent of executives use CX as a competitive differentiator in their industry. But their efforts are weak as just 53 percent measure CX quality consistently, leaving half without a way to tell if they're succeeding. Additionally, less than a third track everything the firm is doing to improve experience. Only 15 percent follow a design process – meaning that 85 percent of firms have no systematic approach to determine what a differentiated CX looks like.

Forrester found that CX leaders achieve customer maturity when they follow a path: Repair, Elevate, Optimize, and Differentiate. Recently, Principle Analyst Megan Burns shared the four requirements necessary to advance each phase with 1to1 Media.

1. Repair
Before they set out to create experiences that satisfy customers, firms should first fix the experiences that pain customers. By doing that, CX leaders begin to change the way their businesses operate. In these initial steps, they must identify problematic customer experiences, prioritize the fixes, coordinate implementation, and measure results.

2. Elevate
In this phase, Burns says to share customer insights routinely, measure thoughtfully, and use the metrics to reward. Most importantly, take best practices and made them standard.

3. Optimize
To take CX from OK to good, companies need to develop sophisticated CX toolkits. That's why, in phase 3, customer experience leaders should: model the relationship between CX and business results, build strong experience design practices, and sharpen employees' CX skills.

4. Differentiate
Burns said that organizations that succeed at differentiating their CX do so because they're unwilling to think differently. This requires companies to deploy advanced research techniques to mine for new types of insights. It also requires the development of a business architecture that's based on customer journeys instead of internal processes.


Amanda Ciccatelli, Social Media Strategist at IIR USA in New York City, has a background in digital and print journalism, covering a variety of topics in business strategy, marketing, and technology. She previously worked at Technology Marketing Corporation as a Web Editor where she covered breaking news and feature stories in the tech industry.  She can be reached at aciccatelli@iirusa.com. Follow her at @AmandaCicc. 
Enhanced by Zemanta